Sabbatical

The doors to the cultural hall are going to be shut for a while as we vacuum the floor. You can peek inside and see what we’ve been discussing over the past couple of years, but comments are closed for the time being. Why? It is simply time for a break.

We hope and expect to come back, and we might even post an interesting news item from time to time, but you’ll need to find another place to talk. That shouldn’t be a problem, given that there are about a bazillion Mormon-related blogs and bulletin boards. If you are the kind of person who is more comfortable in a stimulating Sunday School discussion, you might try By Common Consent. If you find the cultural hall more comfortable than the chapel, try visiting New Order Mormon for its discussion board. Or if you are on your way out of the building altogether, you might consider Main Street Plaza.

Thanks for visiting.

Real Religion

“Here’s what I think in a single sentence: I think that the real religion is about the understanding that if we can only still our egos for a few seconds, we might have a chance of experiencing something that is divine in nature. But in order to do that, we have to slice away at our egos and try to get them down to a manageable size, and then still work some practiced light meditation. So real religion is about reducing our egos, whereas all the churches are interested in is egotistical activities, like getting as many members and raising as much money and becoming as important and high-profile and influential as possible. All of which are egotistical attitudes. So how can you have an egotistical organization trying to teach a non-egotistical ideal? It makes no sense, unless you regard religion as crowd control. What I think most organized religion—simply crowd control.”
John Cleese, from his interview in The Onion

Certitude

One of the more interesting things I heard last weekend at the American Psychological Association convention in Boston was this line, “Absolute certainty and evil are actually the same thing,” from a presentation on the belief systems of religious extremists. It struck me as something that many in the Cultural Hall might agree with. Certitude may give people an enhanced sense of meaning, but it reduces the number of alternatives one perceives to be available. The result is increased extremism, both in attitudes and in actions.

When I heard that idea, that absolute certainty and evil are the same thing, I couldn’t help but think of LDS lore. Remember the story about the suggestion that it might be better to make everyone do the right thing, so that all return to God, vs. the alternative that people have choices? Whether or not you believe that those two proposals were actually put forward in a heavenly council, it is an idea worth pondering. Choice is a basic Mormon ideal, and it seems more real to me when we are less certain. Certitude enhances meaning in one’s life, which has certain benefits, of course. But certitude also limits the number of alternatives we see, which impacts our ability to choose among our options.

Continue reading ‘Certitude’

Mormons for Marriage

I promised to pass along any LDS efforts to counter church support for Prop 8. The purpose of the site is to educate people about  marriage equality and about LDS people who are lesbian or gay and to provide support to LDS people who oppose the proposition. More videos and blog posts will be added until the California election.

http://mormonsformarriage.com/

Comments are welcome, particularly if you have a related story to tell.

30 Days with Same Sex Marriage

When it appeared on television I’d heard about the 30 Days episode featuring an LDS woman, Katie, living with gay men who’d adopted children. I hadn’t been able to see the program, however, until today, when  a friend forwarded me the link. It is fascinating to watch, and it seems to me that Spurlock (the man behind the 30 Days series) has done a fine job presenting a balanced picture of the issue. It is apparent that the gay couple (and their friends) had hoped to change Katie’s mind. They believed that by opening their home and showing that they are good people trying hard to be good parents to four children, their actions would at least soften Katie’s opposition. She remains steadfastly opposed, however, and she describes well how her views are too intertwined with her identity and with her understanding of God and morality to change. The program takes about 43 minutes to watch, and it is well worth your time.

Jesus Wants Me for a Sunbeam, Not for a Torturer

That was the title I suggested to my wife for her talk in sacrament meeting tomorrow. After reading that a graduate of BYU’s law school approved of the “torture memo”, it seems to me that we could benefit from being reminded that Jesus said to turn the other cheek.

What do you think? Should we change the words to the Primary song from “Jesus Wants me for a Sunbeam” to “Jesus Loves Waterboarding”? I don’t remember… was it in the Sermon on the Mount that Jesus approved of physical pain as long as it wasn’t “equivalent in intensity to the pain accompanying serious physical injury, such as organ failure, impairment of bodily function, or even death.”

Sigh. What a world we live in.

To Forward or Not to Forward?

Imagine my husband coming into the house. He steps into the kitchen, and there I am at the computer weeping uncontrollably.
“What happened?” asks spouse as he rushes to me.
Between sobs and catching my breath, I try to answer. It takes a full minute before I speak at all, but finally I manage. “Henrietta just told me about a boy who had to throw a brick through a Jaguar window.”
“Someone threw a brick at Henrietta’s car? Wait a minute, Henrietta drives an old Geo Metro. What was she doing in a Jaguar?”
“Not Henrietta’s Jaguar, just some Jaguar. You’re not listening to the story. The boy was on the side of the road and his little brother was in a wheel chair and he fell out. But no one would stop to help, not one person.”
“Why didn’t Henrietta help him?”
“Henrietta wasn’t there. But anyway, the boy had to throw a brick at the car just to get help.”
“Hmmm. So were these boys friends of Henriettas?”
“She doesn’t know the boys.”
“Oh I get it then. She knew the Jaguar driver.”
“She doesn’t know him either.”
Husband backs away now. He removes his arm from around my trembling shoulders. His interest wanes and he rummages in the refrigerator. Husband pulls out brick of cheese and slices off several pieces. “So, where did this happen?”
“I don’t know,” I say, gaining control now, starting to feel stupid.”
“So now who told Henrietta?”
“People.”
“What people? News people?”
“No, not news people—just people. They forwarded to her. And she forwarded it to me. I’m not sure it really happened. It’s just a story.”
“Oh,” he says as he sticks the cheese in his mouth.
“You have to read it. It’s the best story,” I say as I push the forward button to all my list.”
This was a fairly harmless modern folklore to illustrate a typical forwarded email story. However, many stories circulating the Internet aren’t quite as harmless. Many stories include sentimental stories that end with something like, forward this to all the women you know, or everyone who you care about, or who has touched your life in some way. Nice you think, so you press send. Some emails seem nice, but then they end with a little caveat that says if you don’t pass it on to at least seven people within seven days you will have terrible luck. I’ve even gotten one that said if I didn’t pass the email on, I would never have sex again. Common sense should tell you that it isn’t nice to pass these emails on to anyone you do care about, but I have gotten these kinds of forwards. On the opposite end are the ones promising unimagined blessings if we pass it on to everyone we know. Hmmm. Again, think about it. Neither could be true. Resist the urge to pass the email on.
For years I’ve been getting emails about missing children. Most of these are a hoax, and are actually harming the effort to find the legitimate missing or kidnapped children. Before hitting the forward button on these, take a few seconds and go to www.Snopes.com. Snopes checks out all kinds of rumors, and chances are if the missing child is a hoax it will declare it as such. Another popular type of email is the one that is meant to warn people of danger, or good safety tips. This email may start out with an alarming and shocking story. Again, before hitting send, take a minute and check it out. There are legitimate safety precautions, but don’t burden your friends with unneeded worry about something that isn’t true. Here is an example of a popular chilling urban legend. This was number nine of ten safety tips for women. Checking these tips out on Snopes, told me that some of the tips were useful, while others were actually bad advice. None of us want to pass on safety tips which actually increase danger.
9. Another Safety Point: Someone just told me that her friend heard a crying baby on her porch the night before last, and she called the police because it was late and she thought it was weird. The police told her “Whatever you do, DO NOT open the door.”
The lady then said that it sounded like the baby had crawled near a window, and she was worried that it would crawl to the street and get run over. The policeman said, “We already have a unit on the way, whatever you do, DO NOT open the door.” He told her that they think a serial killer has a baby’s cry recorded and uses it to coax women out of their homes thinking that someone dropped off a baby. He said they have not verified it, but have had several calls by women saying that they hear baby’s cries outside their doors when they’re home alone at night.
Please pass this on and DO NOT open the door for a crying baby — This e-mail should probably be taken seriously because the Crying Baby theory was mentioned on America’s Most Wanted this past Saturday when they profiled the serial killer in Louisiana. I’d like you to forward this to all the women you know. It may save a life. A candle is not dimmed by lighting another candle. I was going to send this to the ladies only, but guys, if you love your mothers, wives, sisters, daughters, etc., you may want to pass it onto them, as well.
Send this to any woman you know that may need to be reminded that the world we live in has a lot of crazies in it and it’s better to be safe than sorry.
Here was Snopes answer for this part of the email:
A more lengthy debunking of the “crying baby” lure can be found on our page devoted to that hoax, but in a nutshell: no serial killer used that ruse, and the story about helpful policemen who instructed the woman who heard such cries to stay inside and not open her door is fiction. The “audio tape of a baby’s cries used by a murderer to draw women from their homes” fabrication was born of the anxiety surrounding the hunt for the Baton Rouge serial killer in 2002. That case was profiled on America’s Most Wanted in September 2002 and again in January 2003, but neither airing made any mention of the purported “crying baby” theory.
The rest of the Snopes details each of the ten tips and offers better advice on avoiding being a victim.
Another Internet story where caution should be used before forwarding on are those potentially offensive or character impugning ones. These kind are harder for some people to detect. Often the sender feels strongly they are just passing on something that all good moral patriotic folks would enjoy reading: Wrong. Being in the political minority in Utah, these are the ones I get the most which I feel cross the line in appropriateness. With immigration such a hot button issue, some of these are racist in content, others border on slander, while others are meant to be funny, but are probably only funny to those in the same mindset. Often the sender just sends to everyone on their list, perhaps not realizing that a few on that list will find the email offensive. If you must forward these, take the time to cull your list and send it only to those who will truly appreciate it.
With such an interesting presidential race, some emails impugn character. Often the forwarded email contains a partial truth, hyped information, or something out of context. Most people feel passionate about politics and learning as much as they can about a candidate before they vote. Gleaning that information from forwarded emails is not an effective way to find information. Check our facts. Check Snopes.com. They will research for you. If it’s too good not to pass on, then it still will be too good after you’ve asked yourself a few questions before pressing send.

California Prop 8– LDS Letter writing campaign

I promised earlier that I’d pass on any information about groups organizing to protest LDS church involvement in supporting Prop 8 (that’s the official name for the ballot measure for the amendment to the California constitution banning gay marriage.) This is the first effort I know of that’s gotten off the ground:

http://signingforsomething.org/blog/

It’s a guide to writing letters in protest, and the folks running the site will even help print the letters and get them delivered if you don’t want to do it yourself.

I’d be interested in hearing of any other efforts.

In support of the amendment, I think that church members are being directed to www.protectmarriage.com .

This coming Sunday, June 29, in California….

I’m sure by now our readers know about the First Presidency letter to be read in church this coming Sunday. I don’t want to get into any debates on this post about the letter itself, or gay marriage. My question is– what do you plan to do when the letter is read this Sunday? Do you plan to be in church? If you support the stance of the letter, I’m guessing that you won’t do much in the meeting itself, but will you actually take action based on it? And if you don’t support the letter, will you walk out? Wear a rainbow ribbon pin to church? Any other ideas? And if you’re in a ward where there is any protest or discussion on Sunday, could you report back here? As for me, I’m still undecided whether to attend, and if so, whether to walk out or not.

What’s in it for me?

In response to my own post, “Should I Stay or Should I Go?” I came up with some interesting ideas of what’s in it for me by not deciding - by sitting on the fence, or in the lawn chair at the crossroads.

By not deciding, I’m maintaining the status quo, which is the path of least resistance and least disruptive to my family.

By sitting on the fence, I get to work both sides of the fence. 

A huge part of this is my (self-perceived) place in the communities on both sides of the Mormon/DAMU divide.   I have a lot of my ego tied up in being Nanna P, DAMU denizen and pontificator.  Not as well known (but still someone people recognize) is Ann the Bloggernacler.  Shallow, but there it is … in both places, I’m “somebody.”  Without them, I just another working stiff. By staying on the fence I can be a welcome (beloved!) participant in both groups, as long as I adhere to the appropriate social norms for each (which is pretty easy to do, because I want to be liked). But because I’m on the fence, I won’t ever be wholly in either group.

And then of course there’s the really big inhibiting factor: fear. Fear of everything. Fear of being duped again. Fear of making the wrong decision. Fear of making a big change, but nothing really changing.

So because I am basically a coward, I’ll probably just stay here in the lawn chair at the crossroads for a while longer. There be dragons down those roads.

(This is probably my public navel-gazing quota for the year. Thanks for the space.)

Should I Stay or Should I Go

I have been a long-time proponent of just parking at the crossroads. Mormons and ex-Mormons alike always say stuff like “if you don’t believe, you should just leave.” And I’ve argued with that, vehemently. I can stay if I want. However, now I don’t know if I want.

There are a number of good reasons for staying. I like many of the people. The church is weird sometimes, but most Mormons are awesome. My husband is a faithful believer, and our little guy likes church a lot. I think it would be difficult for my husband and confusing for the kid if I stopped going. I’m pretty plugged in to the whole Mormon internet thing and I feel really connected there. Some of the doctrines, such as eternal marriage and the divine nature of the soul, are illuminating and exciting.

Lately, though, I’m starting to think that’s not enough - that I’m stunting myself by staying. I might make a pretty decent Christian in another church, but I’m a crappy Mormon. All my past efforts to the contrary, all my insights and hope notwithstanding, it just doesn’t work. The unique things that are absolutely central to a Mormon identity - modern prophets, the restoration, authority - are completely meaningless to me. The undercurrents of sexism and political conservatism drive me absolutely batty.

What bugs me most about this is that by not deciding I am still making a choice. By maintaining the status quo, I’m staying. In the past I’ve made the decision to stick it out, but I seem to come back and revisit that decision over and over. It’s like the only decision I can make that WILL stick is to leave.

This indecision’s bugging me.

Leave cell phone at the door…

Not too long ago a letter was read in our ward from our stake leaders emphasizing a concern about “casualness.” The letter went on to specify dress standards, stressing outward appearance, but not addressing the heart at all. It seems that God has suddenly become very concerned with the style of shoes we wear, facial hair, and the color of shirts men wear to church. What happened to “But the LORD said unto Samuel, Look not on his countenance, or on the height of his stature; because I have refused him: for [the LORD seeth] not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart.” 1 Samual 16:7 A few months later an announcement was made in Relief Society. Now I’m not sure if this latest announcement was our bishop’s personal addendum to the “increased casualness concern” or also from the stake, but it was suggested that women wear nylons to church. This struck many of us as a strange request, especially with the added to “help the men out”. I don’t know if it occurs to male leaders who request such things, that by emphasizing dress standards for reasons other than self-respect, women are further objectified and demeaned. If men have a difficult time feeling the spirit because some woman has the audacity to bare her legs then perhaps it’s the men who have the problem. I don’t think it’s the woman.

Not able to pass up on an opportunity to make a joke about the nylon announcement–joking helps me cope, I found a movie photo from “The Graduate” of Anne Bancroft as Mrs. Robinson seducing Dustin Hoffman’s character. She is putting on her nylons in the scene and has her leg up in a classic pose. Well in my spoof, I wrote, …don’t forget to wear your nylons to church… or something like that. I sent it to a few of my closest friends. I noticed that nylons are generational. Few young women even own them. Do they make a woman more modest? I don’t think so. My husband doesn’t think so either. A man in my ward suggested that he could go down to the local sexually oriented lingerie store and buy “fishnet nylons for all the women in the ward who don’t have them.” He went on to say we could leave a box by the door of the church house, “to help the men out.”

Then more recently another announcement was made in our ward. It was that we shouldn’t bring our cell phones to church with us, and that we shouldn’t spend “too much time” with technology on the Sabbath. Hmmm. perhaps cutting out genealogy done on the internet, writing to your missionaries, family, calling on the phone, What? What happened to “TEACH correct principles and let them govern themselves…:” Joseph Smith. Teaching in generalities helps each of us to grow at our own pace and needs. Emphasizing trivial specifics on dress standards, leaves many feeling bewildered and unsure of their own worth. I had to smile at a recent enrichment night held in the church house. In our service project one less active sister wore short shorts and a spaghetti strap tank top. Was her service any less valued? How would she have felt if someone had said something about the inappropriateness of her dress? Does God value the service of a clean-shaven man any more than that of a man with a beard?

True principles apply to everyone. Each person can individually assess and apply accordingly. But when we stop teaching principles and teach meaningless standards, the Spirit is constrained. I feel a void in my life when leaders micromanage and forget “what matters most.” I go to church craving meaning and truth and come home with a hollowness that isn’t filled. I go to church hungry and come home starving or with nothing but a candy bar for sustenance. I urge a return to teaching principles. Let’s not “sacrifice that which matters most for that which matters least.” Also check this post: beneath the surface

In a discussion with my seminary teaching son about the importance of teaching correct principles and letting people apply that to their own circumstances, he mentioned this quote from Elder Scott: As you seek spiritual knowledge, search for principles. Carefully separate them from the detail used to explain them. Principles are concentrated truth, packaged for application to a wide variety of circumstances. A true principle makes decisions clear even under the most confusing and compelling circumstances. It is worth great effort to organize the truth we gather to simple statements of principle.

Elder Richard G. Scott “Aquiring Spiritual Knowledge”

Book of Mormon Survey

I received word of a study of people’s attitudes about the Book of Mormon. Please take a few minutes to add your responses. The survey is available at

http://nelsonseawright.bookofmormon.sgizmo.com/

All sides of the faith spectrum (true believers, inactives, ex-members, etc.) are welcome to participate.

Fathers

Fathers come in all types. I’m fortunate to have one who is loving and is always there when I need him. Even 40-somethings can use a helpful word from Dad once in a while, y’know.

We Mormons anthropomorphize God, calling him Heavenly Father, and seeing human characteristics in deity. Of course, in doing this we are following the Greeks and others throughout history. People seem to understand God in much the same way we understand each other. Maybe this is one of my problems with God. Continue reading ‘Fathers’

Racism vs. Sexism

We’ve made some amazing strides. The day when it is possible for a either a woman or a black man to have a really good shot at the highest office in the nation is finally here. It’s something we should all be excited about. Martin Luther King Jr.’s poetic and visionary speech “I Have a Dream,” is close to being realized. But while racism isn’t openly tolerated anymore–people lose their jobs–it certainly rears it’s ugly head. Those of us who are frequenters of the Internet have most likely been sent emails that are racist in content though they are perpetuated as patriotic truth. Any article on the subject of immigration, or Obama which allows Anonymous comments will be filled with racist diatribe. However, racism is legislated against. Even Utah finally has a hate crime bill, which by the way doesn’t include language specific to sexual orientation. Also gender issues still fall short. We’ve seen racism and sexism in this race. Some of the comments made by the voters in West Virginia were embarrassing in this day and age. I can handle them voting for Hilary Clinton–I like her–but some of the reasons folks said they voted for her were to say the least in the mindset of pre-civil rights era. Prejudice is lodged in fear and mistrust and perpetuated by telling lies and half-truths.

Sexism is rampant. Recently during a Clinton speech (someone will know where and when) a sign was held that said, “iron my shirts.” That kind of sexism is winked at, laughed at, and at times embraced. Television allows calling women “bitch” all the time. The word should not be used and next to one other word is about the most degrading thing to say about a woman. Political pundits often use the “b” word to describe Hillary Clinton. I’ve heard Mormon men call her a witch. Seriously, guys–we know what you really mean. Again we’ve made strides. Women have the world open to them and even the highest office in the nation, but still until we can eliminate the kind of language that demeans and is meant to keep women in their place we still have a long ways to go.

I grew up in the 70’s. Feminism was a dirty word in LDS society. ERA–equal rights amendment was suspect. We were taught that legislation that guaranteed what men (white men) took for granted was giving into Satanic beliefs, that equal rights for women would destroy the family. I still remember being angry when a phone surveyor called me in 1982 and asked to speak to the “head of the house.” When I answered that my husband and I were both the heads of the household, the woman actually got angry and told me that if I was married that my husband was the head of the household. I have no idea why I allowed myself to be entrapped by a narrow-minded woman who had bought into the common lingo of the time, but I did and found myself fuming with anger.

The church is still filled with sexism and it’s taught as God’s will and truth. Women are often divided on the issues most important to women, motherhood, equality, families, working, and so forth. We are our own worst enemy. Often women who must work or who choose to work outside the home judge women who stay at home and vice versa. This isn’t common just to Mormon women–Oprah did a whole show on it. It might as well have been a Relief Society discussion. The issues were the same, the arguments were the same, and the group was about as equally divided as I’ve seen in any church group.

I guess my point and I do have one is that we still have a ways to go when it comes to equality. Basically it just comes down to respect.  We should learn to be more kind, more accepting, more tolerant, and more willing to give people a chance. And all this means eliminating the kinds of language and actions that divide us, whether they be divisions on race, religion, or on gender. It’s my hope that this presidential race–no matter the outcome–will be one that brings us together.

How I navigate Mormonism while being a rationalist, non-believing, feminist

How I navigate Mormonism while being a rationalist, non-believing, feminist:

1) To avoid the guilt that I initially felt upon disbelieving [early in my 20s], I recognized that everyone has their own form of Mormonism. Thanks to a great therapist. Everyone emphasizes something different-even the GAs. And there are even the crazies who use mormonism to justify their own hatreds [of foreigners, gays, working women, whatever]. I just provide the counterbalance to those who go off the right- wing end.

Continue reading ‘How I navigate Mormonism while being a rationalist, non-believing, feminist’

Social Influence and Defining Marriage

The California Supreme Court recently ruled that the state’s ban on gay marriage was unconstitutional. The Mormon internet has been busy with comments and reaction to the ruling, which will almost certainly be the subject of a ballot initiative in November to add the ban to the state constitution. Of course, the LDS church’s involvement in 2000 on California’s Proposition 22 is well known, and many observers expect the church to campaign actively in favor of the expected November ballot initiative. We shall see.

Continue reading ‘Social Influence and Defining Marriage’

Aspects of Mormon life that I love

 Guest post by Natasha:

I have wanted to post on this a long time.  I think sometimes I spend too much time thinking about how Mormonism limits me, without thinking about how it has helped me.   But as a mostly non-believer, I stay in Mormonism because my life has been so enriched by it.

Aspects of Mormonism that I love/like:

–the belief that we each have a divine worth and should therefore make decisions accordingly.  I don’t know if I believe this anymore, but when I did, it helped me to make MUCH better decisions than I would have otherwise, especially as a young person.

– the “it takes a village [ward] to raise a child” mentality.  Hillary was right!  Our children do so much better if there is a community of mostly good people looking after them, and not just the nuclear family.  My husband spends a lot of time helping other peoples’ teenage boys [in scouts] learn responsibility and decency and I look forward to someone else reinforcing these same values to my sons when they are older.  I love that my ward growing up gave me several families as  alternative examples so that I know that my dysfunctional nuclear family was not the only way to go.

Continue reading ‘Aspects of Mormon life that I love’

Every member a friend?

Since I’ve never lived outside of Utah for more than three months, I’m about as Utah Mormon as they come–that is as far as geography. I grew up in one of those cities south of the Mormon curtain (the point of the mountain) that is close to 90 % LDS. Nevertheless one of my best friends and next door neighbors wasn’t a member. “Jamie” came to primary with me. In those days, primary was right after school on Tuesdays, and everyone simply walked from the school to the church house. I didn’t think anything about her coming. She came simply because it was something to do–not because she had any interest in the church. Besides primary was fun back then. And we got these really cool green bandalos to wear with great looking icons glued onto them. She decided that since she came to my church, that the fair thing would be for me to go to hers, and so she invited me. Her church was called the Community Church of Christ, (I think.) I must’ve been around ten. Continue reading ‘Every member a friend?’

Religion is a practice (please watch this video)

As scholar Karen Armstrong accepts her 2008 TED Prize, she talks about how the Abrahamic religions — Islam, Judaism, Christianity — have been diverted from the moral purpose they share to foster compassion. But Armstrong has seen a yearning to change this fact. People want to be religious, she says; we should act to help make religion a force for harmony. She asks the TED community to help her build a Charter for Compassion — to help restore the Golden Rule as the central global religious doctrine.

Watch Karen Armstrong’s talk here

or http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/234

When the shelf comes crashing down

I’d heard once that Sister Camilla Kimball had said that when there was something about the gospel she didn’t understand, she put that on a shelf. I liked the idea. I envisioned a shelf full of food storage and canned goods, and I started piling up my issues–stuff that I didn’t understand. Polygamy—that’s a big one—about a fifty pound bag of flour. Next, the priesthood being barred from blacks—another 5O pound bag of flour. Already my shelf was starting to sag pretty heavily in the middle, but I was doing okay. I could move forward. I still had a testimony. In spite of what people say, about a never-changing church, I was more than okay with the church changing. Nothing is perfect in the early fledging years—so I told myself. We are better now. Polygamy has publicly been labeled a “blip” That “blip” has caused considerable heartbreak, abuse, and misunderstanding—some are still being victimized. Look at Texas. But I could keep that on the shelf.

Continue reading ‘When the shelf comes crashing down’

Moving Forward: The LDS Polygamy Question

In today’s Salt Lake Tribune is an op-ed piece I wrote about polygamy, copied below. Some people will say I’m overstepping my bounds, and others will say I don’t go far enough. I simply hope it makes people think about the church’s connections to polygamy. The present policy - relying on the Associated Press and other news organizations to clarify who is and who is not Mormon - seems bound to fail, as the public doesn’t consult the AP Style Guide when they talk about such things.

Continue reading ‘Moving Forward: The LDS Polygamy Question’

Explaining Accidents

When I moved 15 years ago to this small corner of Georgia, Bill was one of the first people I met. He greeted me with a broad smile and a twinkle in his eye, and there was never a moment that I doubted he genuinely cared about me. Some people have that gift.

My next memory of him is when I gave my first talk in Sacrament meeting. Our branch met in a tightly-packed “phase 1″ building, so I had plenty of opportunity for eye contact. His are the eyes I remember best from that day. As I gave my talk, I quickly learned that I could count on him for feedback that told me that I was being heard. Really heard. He smiled, nodded his head, and then took time afterwards to discuss my talk and to welcome me again to the branch.

A few days ago he had an accident at home, and now he is gone. The viewing was this evening; the funeral tomorrow. I will miss him and his smile. There have been days when I missed church, whether because I was out of town or just not in the mood, or I didn’t want to sit through three hours with lighting that can trigger my migraines. On those days, I may not have missed the lesson I disagreed with, heterodox guy that I am, but I certainly missed Bill and his smile.

While at the viewing, a friend tried to make sense of his death. She believes that the accident was God’s way of “bringing Bill home”. Another friend suggested that his wife, who died a few months ago, needed him. Maybe the universe works that way, with a God that intervenes, causing accidents that take lives when our “time is up”. Maybe, but I’m more inclined to think deaths like Bill’s happen for reasons other than divine intervention. Accidents happen, and the laws of physics cause trauma to our bodies. Life is fragile that way.

We look for answers, for reasons to explain the events in our lives. We seek those answers when it comes to explaining death as well. Whichever answer we arrive at, we find comfort in it. If the answer includes God taking care of us and then calling us home, the comfort seems obvious. But it also leaves us to explain why God’s intervention appears unreliable.

If the answer is more like mine, comfort comes in different forms; for me it comes in the sense of connection with humanity through a shared engagement with life. And there is comfort, too, in knowing that the memory of Bill’s smile, and the many good things he did, lives on. My friends and I may disagree over the question of divine intervention, but we agree on our connection to a fellow traveler and to each other. For me, that’s enough.

General Conference thread

Not here!  There are threads going already at Mormon Matters, Messenger and Advocate, Our Thoughts, Mormon Mentality, Times and Seasons, and By Common Consent.

We may not have a lot of action here, but we’re not redundant.

Morality Beyond Sexuality

One theme that I hear often in Mormonism concerns morality and its central place in society. Most recently I came across this idea in an op-ed piece in the Salt Lake Tribune. The writer, Lynn Wardle, described his views regarding morality in the context of Elliot Spitzer’s downfall. (I don’t think copyright law allows me cut & paste Wardle’s comments here but you can click on this link to read them at the Trib.)
Continue reading ‘Morality Beyond Sexuality’

Thoughts on Loving our Sisters and Brothers

I read this a couple of days ago and thought it is a wonderful reminder to us all

“Our task is to learn that if we can voyage to the ends of the earth and there find ourselves in the aborigine who most differs from ourselves, we will have made a fruitful pilgrimage. That is why pilgrimage is necessary, in some shape or other.  Mere sitting at home and meditating on the divine presence is not enough for our time.  We have to come to the end of a long journey and see that the stranger we meet there, is no other than ourselves—which is the same as saying that we find Christ in him”  –Thomas Merton

Eckhart Tolle on Spirituality and Religion

In Eckhart Tolle’s book entitled: A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life’s Purpose, it says the following about Spirituality and Religion:

What is the role of the established religions in the arising of the new consciousness? Many people are already aware of the difference between spirituality and religion. They realize that having a belief system–a set of thoughts that you regard as the absolute truth-does not make you spiritual no matter what the nature of those beliefs is. In fact, the more you make your thoughts (beliefs) into your identity, the more cut off you are from the spiritual dimension within yourself. Many “religious” people are stuck at that level. They equate truth with thought, and as they are completely identified with thought (their mind), they claim to be in sole possession of the truth in an unconscious attempt to protect their identity. They don’t realize the limitations of thought. Unless you believe (think) exactly as they do, you are wrong in their eyes, and in the not-too distant past, they would have felt justified in killing you for that. And some still do, even now. Continue reading ‘Eckhart Tolle on Spirituality and Religion’

Tom Lantos and Mormonism

Tom Lantos, a powerful member of the US House of Representatives for many years, died recently. In this report of his funeral I learned he had a significant connection to Mormonism: His wife and daughters, who apparently converted some time ago.
Continue reading ‘Tom Lantos and Mormonism’

Spiritual Practice

I just read Jana Riess’ Essay Tributaries of my Faith.  It is thoughtful and beautiful.  One part that really jumped out at me is about spiritual practice (bolded below). 

How we cooperate in the world’s redemption brings me to the second tributary of my faith, Renewal—spiritual rejuvenation through concrete, regular disciplines. Spiritual disciplines such as prayer, Sabbath-keeping, and fasting invite us back to God. They give us a rhythm for the days, the weeks, the months, the years. In Mormonism, we have a wonderful tradition of emphasizing the vital importance of the spiritual disciplines. We want to do it right. But the flip side of that emphasis is that too often Mormons adopt a legalistic view of spiritual practice—what matters is that you do it correctly, not that it changed you or that you are growing from the practice. We need to guard against dead legalism and rote religion. We also need to guard against our unstinting activism. Don’t get me wrong; one of the things I find most attractive about Mormonism is our firm tie to this world and to its people—we are here to serve one another. This is key. But what we lack, and what Christian history can teach us, is the equally important value of contemplation. Holding action and contemplation in a balanced tension is one of the greatest calls of the Christian life.

Question for the group:

What are some real ways you have changed and grown because of the practice of Mormonism? Even though you might take a non-traditional or non-literal approach. Read her entire essay here (pdf)

Rocky Mountain Retreat– update

rockymountainretreatheader.jpg

Rocky Mountain Retreat for LDS Women (Links to earlier post about the retreat)

This year’s featured speaker is Claudia Bushman.

Registration is open now. For more details, and registration forms, visit the retreat’s website.

Link to good “Middle Way” post

I really liked this post on Zelophehad’s Daughters site by Lynette.

It is called The “Only True” Church: Does “True” Necessitate “Only”?

Also, have any of you read from the Theologian Paul Knitter? I have not but now I am curious.

Sharing the Gospel ??

I was in the UK last week and had the chance to visit with some dear friends that are serving a mission there (senior missionaries).  I asked them the following question:

“What is different about the Church over there, or at least different than you expected?”

The response surprised me.They said:

 “The Saints here love the Church very much. But seem very reluctant to share the Gospel with others and seem reluctant to share friend’s names with the missionaries.”

 My questions to you all on this Blog.

  1. Is this unique to the UK (nobody does it here in New York either) I don’t think people in general feel comfortable with this?
  2. Do any of you invite friends to Church? Or have you ever given names of friends or collegues to missionaries. How do you feel about it?
  3. Do you view the Gospel and the Mormon Church as the same thing or two very different things?

Mourning with my Alma Mater

My alma mater, Northern Illinois University, is mourning today, following a shooting in one of its classrooms. News reports say that a gunman whose identity is not presently known shot and killed four students and wounded many  more when he fired a shotgun and then pistol in a large auditorium classroom before turning his pistol on himself. It is sad, and it hits me close to home as I think of the many exams I proctored in that very classroom during my grad school days. Continue reading ‘Mourning with my Alma Mater’

Did I Forget to Get Angry?

Hello everyone,

I know I don’t post often but I have been thinking about something and I felt like this was the right place to air the laundry.

So like many of you, Mormonism really screwed me up. I mean it was doing a number on me while I was in it, but leaving really turned my brain around. In the subsequent years I have noticed a severe increase in depression and anxiety and a general decrease in more obscure fields like purpose and sense of belonging. After 5 years out of the church I look around and think “Hey! Wha’ happened?”

While leaving the church I was obsessed with not being one of those ex-mormons; the kind who spend all their time seething and hating on the apostles and jumping all over the doctrine and pointing out that Brigham Young owned slaves or whatever. You know, the kind of person whose comments we tend to delete on this site.

That’s not to say I wasn’t mad, but I didn’t really focus it anywhere. I didn’t get mad at the prophet or apostles. They seem like good guys. I didn’t get mad at my bishop, or my mission president even though they were kind of jerks about the whole thing. I didn’t even really have any fights with my parents where I told them how much the church had hurt me. In fact once I left I got really positive about the church just so they wouldn’t… well I don’t know why. It just seemed the thing to do.

Joseph Smith once said, and I paraphrase: Anyone who leaves the church is not just gonna hate it, but they will be an enemy to it the rest of their lives.

Well I don’t want that. Why does it have to be like that?

I have often described the feelings surrounding leaving the church as the same around breaking up with your one true love. You thought your relationship was one thing, but it turned out pretty f’en different. But a lot of those feelings, anger, pain, rage, they don’t have anywhere to go. With relationships you can always find some other sucker to take you on, but I have zero desire to find another religion (sorry Unitarian church, I’m just not feelin’ ya).

So this is my question: What do I do with this black tornado inside of me? What do you do?  Should I pretend I am 15 and the next time I visit my parents storm out of a room slamming a door yelling “You don’t own me!” Should I go punch some missionaries in the nose (god knows it happened to me enough on my mission)? Should I just get a punching bag and some stronger sedatives?

Joseph Smith also said, and again I paraphrase: If a religion can’t ask you to give it everything, and I mean EVERYTHING, then that’s a wussy religion.

Ladies and Gents, I’m here to tell ya, that Mormonism aint no wuss.

Sighsville. Thanks for letting me vent everyone. John I’ll understand it if you take away my posting privileges.

Rejection

While reading a New Order Mormon discussion recently I came upon a message that made me stop and think for a moment. The discussion concerned how to deal with family members’ rejection when one has decided to leave the church. A writer described her wish to renounce her LDS Church membership, but feared the rejection that would come from her “DNA Mormon” family. One person commented, “Its hard to believe that there are people who love the church more than their family, but maybe instead of love a better way to look at it is they are more afraid of the church than they are their family.” Continue reading ‘Rejection’

Remote Control Reproduction

Wow, can you imagine what it would be like to control sperm-flow via remote control? This technology is exciting, but scary. What if your parents or bishop got hold of your remote? Or what if your kids found it lying in the bottom of the nightstand drawer and inadvertently flipped the switch? What happens if/when reproduction (for both sexes) becomes just a matter of typing in a password to activate the necessary parts of one’s body?

Me, I’m thrilled that reproductive technology has allowed me to choose when to have my children. But there’s something still a bit too scary about a computer-controlled vasectomy.

Rocky Mountain Retreat

Snow Mountain Ranch

Save the Date

2008 Rocky Mountain Retreat for LDS Women,
May 30th - June 1, 2008
Snow Mountain Ranch, YMCA of the Rockies

Featured speaker: Claudia Bushman
More details and registration info coming mid-February

An announcement for Mormon “women of good will” who’d like to spend a weekend in the Colorado Rockies, eating, talking and meeting others. Continue reading ‘Rocky Mountain Retreat’

Religion and Humor

Religion and comedy have been in the news recently, with some interesting Mormon angles to the story. A few weeks ago the Salt Lake Tribune had an article about Mormon comics that was quite funny. Alas, the article is archived, although you can still view the comments at that site and I think you can pay to see the original at the Trib archive. In today’s Deseret News is another, arising from Mike Huckabee’s joke about a family recipe that offended Catholics. The story also mentions some jokes I’ve collected on my website. Take a minute and enjoy the jokes. It’s Saturday, after all, and you deserve a smile.

Interview excerpts w/ Greg Prince

For me personally, one of the most important factors in keeping the “Mormon Experience” meaningful in my life has been finding mentors. Getting to know women and men who are bright, compassionate, thoughful and still connected. I am lucky to have had Greg Prince as one of these people in my life. Our families have been friends as long as I can remember. His impact on me has been significant.

This morning I re-read pieces of his interview for the documentary on PBS. It did my heart good. Thanks again Greg.

Here are some of my favorite highlights and a link to the interview:

Continue reading ‘Interview excerpts w/ Greg Prince’

Is it worse?

Note to our gentle readers and those who read this blog at work: this post is about sexuality and the more explicit portion is after the “continue reading” link….

As a teen I was always confused what the term “petting” and “necking” meant. I knew what “making out” was and after time came to equate making out and necking. But the petting thing was always a bit of a mystery. Some bishops gave rough definitions like “touching any part of your partner’s body that would normally be covered by a bathing suit.” But the variations of touching were mystifying–did it mean touching while clothed? or touching without clothes? And did touching mean just with a hand or did it mean touching in general (as in, if two people were kissing and rubbing the bathing-suit parts of their bodies together were they ‘petting’)?

I suspect the actual definition of petting varied according to the bishop using the term. What he meant might be totally different from what another bishop meant (as an aside–do they still use this same ‘petting’ terminology with teens or is there some more current lingo?). Continue reading ‘Is it worse?’

Perfume for Mom’s birthday

When I was about 8 years old, I remember wondering why my Mom was always so exhausted and wishing that she could relax and have some fun. At the time there was a commercial on TV for a particular perfume that featured an energetic woman doing sporty activities. The details are fuzzy now, but I just remember wishing that my Mom could feel that way. So I went to the drugstore with all of my saved up allowance and bought her a bottle of that perfume for her birthday.

I remember seeing the bottle sitting on the back of the toilet in her bathroom for a few years after that, unused. Sometimes I